<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple and NFB Reach Agreement on iTunes Accessibility</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lioncourt.com/2008/09/26/apple-and-nfb-reach-agreement-on-itunes-accessibility/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lioncourt.com/2008/09/26/apple-and-nfb-reach-agreement-on-itunes-accessibility/</link>
	<description>...extra! extra!...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 16:05:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake</title>
		<link>http://www.lioncourt.com/2008/09/26/apple-and-nfb-reach-agreement-on-itunes-accessibility/comment-page-1/#comment-78</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 23:18:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lioncourt.com/?p=193#comment-78</guid>
		<description>The reason for the timing of this announcement is obvious, I don&#039;t think we really need to discuss NFB&#039;s onesidedness in this. Nevertheless I am surprised they were willing to work with Apple, given how dead set against them they have been up until now. To me this shows Apple&#039;s commitment more than NFB&#039;s, being willing to work with an organization that until now has done nothing but slander and spread misinformation about them. I was wondering how the NFB would react, I guess I have my answer now. It must stick in their throats like a bad apple :). I just hope this isn&#039;t an attempt by the NFB to try and get apple to downplay accessibility in OS X in the long run. If NFB and Apple are in an agreement who knows what they&#039;ll try to do? We already saw it happen with Narrator. Here&#039;s hoping some of the blindness companies don&#039;t start developing extremely expensive screen readers for OS X and undermind everything Apple has done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reason for the timing of this announcement is obvious, I don&#8217;t think we really need to discuss NFB&#8217;s onesidedness in this. Nevertheless I am surprised they were willing to work with Apple, given how dead set against them they have been up until now. To me this shows Apple&#8217;s commitment more than NFB&#8217;s, being willing to work with an organization that until now has done nothing but slander and spread misinformation about them. I was wondering how the NFB would react, I guess I have my answer now. It must stick in their throats like a bad apple <img src='http://www.lioncourt.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> . I just hope this isn&#8217;t an attempt by the NFB to try and get apple to downplay accessibility in OS X in the long run. If NFB and Apple are in an agreement who knows what they&#8217;ll try to do? We already saw it happen with Narrator. Here&#8217;s hoping some of the blindness companies don&#8217;t start developing extremely expensive screen readers for OS X and undermind everything Apple has done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.lioncourt.com/2008/09/26/apple-and-nfb-reach-agreement-on-itunes-accessibility/comment-page-1/#comment-77</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 19:07:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lioncourt.com/?p=193#comment-77</guid>
		<description>I agree that the timing of this announcement is rather circumspect.  I&#039;m also confused as to why Apple would give $250,000 to the Mass commission?  At least Apple can&#039;t become NFB&#039;s next &quot;Target.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that the timing of this announcement is rather circumspect.  I&#8217;m also confused as to why Apple would give $250,000 to the Mass commission?  At least Apple can&#8217;t become NFB&#8217;s next &#8220;Target.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

